committee and joins me now. so security, we have seen the cables now from ambassador stevens saying on august 8th in a cable called guns of august, how bad security was, asking for more bodyguards. september 10th, again, warning about security. the next day, of course, the fatal attack. security failures and intelligence analysis, a failure of analysis afterwards? >> i'm not sure you can equate the two. i think on the security side, at least from the state department's perspective, certainly didn't analyze the threat correctly. if they went ahead and denied extra coverage and think about it, lots of threat streams going into 9/11 this year from al qaeda in the magrab, we had al sharia, a growing group who said they wanted to be successful on a western target. all of that including, by the way, not one but two strikes on that consulate in months prior to it should have led even the newest intelligence analyst for the state department to come to the conclusion hey, listen, this is a dangerous place, the ambassador doesn't feel comfortable, we need more security for them. you're not go